🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". A law could be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," stated the MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly occurring at the state government level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some figures to mimic the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from the West, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states around the world are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.